Liquibase Community Forum
2010-11-12 16:53:47 UTC
A new topic, 'does onValidationFail work for checksum errors?', has been made on a board you are watching.
You can see it at
http://liquibase.org/forum/index.php?topic=782.new#new
The text of the topic is shown below:
Hello,
I was wondering if the "onValidationFail" attribute is controling the behaviour when a checksum error occurs?
I'm asking, because in our app we have some special changesets that are generated and might add some columns to createTable/addColumn tags on the next run. We know, that we want to skip (MARK_RAN) them whether they changed or not. I was trying "onValidationFail=MARK_RAN", but I still get checksum errors. So what I now use is "runOnChange=true" and a precondition that will skip the change in this case. Is there a better way to achieve this?
Regards,
Eike
Unsubscribe to new topics from this board by clicking here: http://liquibase.org/forum/index.php?action=notifyboard;board=1.0
Regards,
The Liquibase Community Forum Team.
You can see it at
http://liquibase.org/forum/index.php?topic=782.new#new
The text of the topic is shown below:
Hello,
I was wondering if the "onValidationFail" attribute is controling the behaviour when a checksum error occurs?
I'm asking, because in our app we have some special changesets that are generated and might add some columns to createTable/addColumn tags on the next run. We know, that we want to skip (MARK_RAN) them whether they changed or not. I was trying "onValidationFail=MARK_RAN", but I still get checksum errors. So what I now use is "runOnChange=true" and a precondition that will skip the change in this case. Is there a better way to achieve this?
Regards,
Eike
Unsubscribe to new topics from this board by clicking here: http://liquibase.org/forum/index.php?action=notifyboard;board=1.0
Regards,
The Liquibase Community Forum Team.